To connect or not connect, that is the question of the modern educator…
Three teachers used Edmodo to ask students to explore
individual profiles of 19
th-century immigrants. The result was the
students showed empathy, as well as “demonstrated deeper understanding of the
mechanism by which immigrants sought cultural and societal integration in 19
th-century
America” (Schulten, 2013).
AFTER THOUGHT: Wouldn’t an amazing next step be exploring
the profiles of contemporary immigrants and refugees? The faces of the 19th-century
immigrants were historically much different than those coming to the United
States today.
An English Language Learner (ELL) instructor at a community
college is asking students to use their cell phones to take images of new
vocabulary and idioms that they encounter outside of the classroom. They are
using social media to build their own word lists, as well as bridge the real
world with the classroom.
AFTER THOUGHT: I
would love to see those students use the images to produce storyboards that
narrate their stories (fiction or real time/past or present).
Why so much hate?
Social media is banned in the majority of the school
districts across the United States.
Recently, the Los Angeles Unified School District
reinitiated a
$1 billion plan to put an iPad in the hands of all students. The
first attempt failed because the students cracked the security settings that
had locked out Internet and social media. Officials quickly confiscated all the
electronic devices once they discovered the breech.
So, the unified school district wants the students to use
disabled iPads to their fullest potential? I just keep getting the image of someone tying my feet
together and yelling, “Run! Run!”
My daughter has long since graduated from high school (last
January), but I have several memories of being asked for math help. You have
lost me after basic algebra (although I can hold my own in statistics – the
brain is a perplexing place to function).
After the initial eye-rolling and teenager let-down, her
fingers would start wildly tapping the keyboard like a mad-scientist on the
brink of world destruction when an “Ah-Ha!” would echo triumphantly through the
apartment… one or several of her friends had tutored her via a variety of
virtual resources from social media to video to watching real-time examples on
a shared virtual document or brain storming app.
They didn’t do her homework for her. They actually helped
her study virtually. They did for her what I could not.
Social media was crucial, and still is, to her academic
success.
BUT what are students doing the other 50% of time?
The answer to that question depends on what author or
resource that you decide to read.
 |
My daughter and one of our
favorite students, Se-Ra. |
Susan J. Brooks-Young (2010) argues that social media
replaced all the banned public gathering spaces where youths can no longer
congregate. Brooks-Young cites a collection of curfew and loitering laws that
make it near impossible for students to gather, be loud, and socialize without
getting into trouble with the lawman.
Insert old Western Sheriff here saying, “Why, our town shuts
down at sunset and only the outlaws and teenagers roam the streets in this here parts… and I
know how to take care of the outlaws and teenagers… Why, yes I do.”
Social media – good, bad, or ugly – is the public social
space for millions of teens (and now people over 35 are no longer social media
strangers – we have to figure out what our kids are doing somehow).
Many authors are contributing social media with the
negativity and disassociation. In The
Winter of Our Disconnect, Susan Maushart cites that our bodies actually
produce chemical reactions when in a conversation with someone (while in the flesh) that doesn’t occur
virtually. Scientists claim that depression and other ill effects can set in
without face-to-face conversations.
Maushart also goes on to identify examples of teenage
violence that the perpetuator contributed to “just needing to feel alive” or
some such, after being isolated in his virtual world, and apparently, was taken
aback when her son could relate to such thinking.
SIDENOTE: I must admit that I don’t know any teenagers who
use the dialect that Maushart is trying to capture in her epic life's tale of a family off technology… it is just makes me uncomfortable reading it (and I don’t
know why).
Let’s get serious for a moment.
Both authors noted that the number one issue online is
cyber-bullying and there has been
a rash of accusations (accompanied withpictures of proof) followed by young suicides that have verified that the
virtual world is just as weighted as the empty streets once used to be for GenXers
(and all generations before). Playground bullying has been taken an unfortunate new sophistication.
Are educators more likely to identify potential cyber-bullying, if they are on the same social networks as their students? What is hall monitoring in the iGeneration age?
I also know that my daughter would have never made it
through math without it…
How effective is to always power-down every time that they
enter into a classroom? Do we really have their attention or just their obedience?
As an educator, I prefer to have their attention.